King Priam of Troy

Come inside the wall, child here you may fight on to save our fifth column men and women was the last search King Priam of Troy had in redeeming Prince swagger from red ink taboo of their walls to go head to head with Achilles.He was speaking non only as a king but also as his induce. This was the last(a) invocation of the king who already foresaw the doom that Troy was meeting. Priam had already declared that push around would die if he went out there. He could only plead with his parole non to go out and give Achilles the glory that he was pursuance in his invitation for a battle between them.Priam used different arguments to keep Hector from going out to face Achilles. In this situation, the readers could feel the despair of Priam that represented the desperation of the entire city. The readers, as they sense the desperation of Priam would interpret with the old king and rally behind the prince of Troy. The king basically presented the directions by which the story would go into.Priams argument included that if Hector did not go out to meet Achilles, he could still fight, together with the Trojan army, for the women and men of the city.He would not let Achilles have his glory. He would show his father pity by not going outside. On the other hand, if Hector went out, Priam already knew what would happen my sons brought d let, my daughters dragged away, bedchambers ravaged, and small children hurled to earth in the atrocity of war, as my sons wives are taken by Achaeans ruinous hands.The final words a father could say to his son, who was intimately to meet his death, was something that travel the readers into rallying for Hector. Before, Achilles may have been the protagonist but this talk false the tables around and the readers empathized for the fate of the Trojans and sees Prince Hector as significant in their lives. This speech made Hectors death more meaningful and grievous for the readers. It was something that made the climax of the epic more dramatic and heart racking that was attributed to Homers storytelling.Book 23Achilles was seen as a brute that killed Hector in his animalistic furor. It was evident that before Hector died, Homer already picture him as the prince, the son, the husband and the father.Hector was all these things to the Trojans and yet Achilles was just seen as a great warrior. The glory that was meant for Achilles could not be fully appreciated because he was not all the things Hector were. It seemed that the readers would think that it should have been Hector who had win the battle instead of Achilles.When the ghost of Patroclos appeared to Achilles, the readers were reminded of why Achilles killed Hector. It was to avenge his dear relay station and cousin. It reminded the readers of the emotional side of Achilles who was also heartbroken when Hector murdered Patroclos. make up if it was accidental, this confusion provided for this epic a tragedy.Patroclos appeared and urged Achilles to retrieve his body from the Trojans because he apparently could not crossover without a proper burial. It showed the pitying side of Achilles more than emphasizing on the character of Patroclos.However, it did show him and how he depended on Achilles, still up in the moments in his afterlife wherein he was crying out to Achilles to let his soul rest. He accused Achilles of neglect when he had died when in reality, Achilles mourned for him and even murdered Hector because of him.However, the bottom line of the passage served its purpose for getting the readers sympathy for Achilles. He was not just some prince-murderer. He was Patroclos avenger.The particular that it was Hector who had accidentally killed him was played a powerful part of the epic. It was however established when Patroclos made Achilles remember the depth of the consequence of his death never again will you and I, alive and breathing, huddle side-by side, apart from loyal comrades, fashioning plans togeth ernever.AgamemnonAegisthus, the lover of Agamemnons wife Clytaemnestra, spoke the passage. It was in solution to the recrimination of the emit because of the joy he found in the murder of his cousin, Agamemnon himself. The chorus was made out of the elderly mass in the council. They were rebuking him for his adulterous interest with Clytaemnestra.In the passage, he was going against the chorus with words and actions. He talked down to the elders in language and nonverbal demeanors. He felt that he had every secure to considering what his family, especially his father had been by because of Agamemnons father.His speech expressed the rage he had and how he did not care nor was he afraid of the things that would sweep up as he saw this conviction as the time for avenging his family. Agamemnons family had bewilder down his family in such a horrible manner and it was time for Aegisthus to put down everyone else because of it. He was showing how he had the f number hand now and it indicated his pride and confidence for the situation.The passage regarded the threats he had for the chorus line of Elders and for anyone who would come against him. He came like a bully who was willing to put down anything. During this time, it seemed that he had consolidated for himself the power that his father was fighting for. However, this time it seemed that he was going to rule with an iron hand.He was especially not going to make it easy on those who sided with Agamemnon and those who rebuked him, Youll learn, in your late age, how muck it hurts to get word old bones their place. He peril them with captivity and deprivation of food. He saw that it was fit for the chorus because of how they looked down on him, despite the detail that he was responsible for a murder.He was oblivious and contained a self-righteous take care that he validated because of a past that had left him embittered. He archetype that he was the one in control as he threatened to teach them a les son the hard way. However, this was seen to be a foreshadowing of his own downfall in the end.While readers understand his rage, they were also turned off by his arrogance and disrespect. It showed how his bitterness had pulled him to the dark side and how it was understandable and acceptable if he did not get what he had always wanted.Pericles Funeral OrationThucydides revealed in Pericles funeral oration the casualties of war. It reflected on the humanity that was involved and affected because of war. In this passage, he was talking closely a plague that overtook the area. People were dying everywhere and it just multi-colour a devastating scenario, sight of people dying like sheep through having caught the disease as a result of nursing others. People could not help because it was an infectious disease and there was a sense of hopelessness that aroseThis passage was also heartbreaking in the manner by which human lives were at stake and no one could really do anything about it if they were not willing their own lives. It was a tragedy because of the number of the people who died and how no one could do anything about it because if they did they would also die.