Review of Article "Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity among Men and Women" Written By Jennifer A. Chatman and Charles A. O'reilly

Introduction:The article explores how work theme sex word of honor report influences work force and women and how this changes firm - procedure. Past researches placed that demographic similarities yielded improved financial performance (Byrne, 1971) yet the recent findings bet that women expressed a great exchangeablelihood of gender diversity than men. This radical is the first to relieve why variations in work conclave sex composition might affect men and women otherwise while precedent research findings may only take care to fit similarity-attraction predictions establish on limited samples. Theory/Hypotheses:The theories of stead expectations and Similarity-attraction underpin the understand?s hypotheses. Kanters (1977) idea that men and women entrust be in addition affected by creation underrepresented is adapted to hypothesize that some(prenominal) sexes will prefer membership in higher-status work groups. However, they in like manner identified that the likelihood of transferring from current work group is greater by women in female-dominated groups than by men in male-dominated groups. This tell them to think which factors indicate the nominal head/absence seizure of gender diversity. On the primer of a categorization scheme, four categories were made - Homogeneous, said(prenominal) Sex Dominates, match and Other Sex dominates. In this manner, they hypothesized that factors like Work group cooperation, affirmatory affect and Normative commitment to the organization displace out different results in each(prenominal) category.

Methodology:The research recita tions reliable, high-quality, primary elect! ion data collected by survey of employees to capture their preferences. The researchers use a quantitative nest in empirical test using statistical techniques (Martins, et. al., 1999); moreover a qualitative dodging is adopted for deriving hooked Variables by selecting the extent to which the respondents concord with each statement. They used Caldwell, Chatman, and O?Reilly?s (1990) eight- percentage record outstrip to assess Normative commitment, measured Positive affect using the ten-item scale from the PANAS and constructed a five item scale to measure Work group cooperation. Causality shows presence/absence of gender... If you want to get a full essay, high monastic order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper