Functionalism and Poverty

Bethune cookman university Poverty From A Functionalist & A difference gear uping amicable Problems SO 132 John Arthur Jackson, III 9/29/2012 This assignment exit analyze two different forms of social analysis and how it relates to explaining the man of destitution. Functionalists status & Its View Concerning Poverty As it concerns social analysis, the functionalists commit that ball club is a stable, and orderly system comprised of inter cogitate, and interdependent parts all work together to achieve homeostasis (equilibrium).As far as the private is concerned, they view them as being shaped by orderliness, a relatively passive large number molded by their experience and interactions with society. Any change that occurs in society is deemed disruptive and the system would seek to restore balance quickly. In addition, any part that is dysfunctional is correlated to the system as a whole, and at that stain is not one thing that stands in isolation from the other. Concerning poverty, functionalists argue that poverty is not as app arent as the figures put it. There is a consensus that even though poverty is a social problem, it isnt as abundant as we think it is.This consensus is come to after the functionalists take into term the antipoverty benefits that are available for those who experience and only when like that poverty is frequently lower than popular belief. So in lament terms functionalists charter that if we take into account all of the available benefits that are for poor spate then we would come to a conclusion that poverty is lower than estimation. As you trick see, poverty from this perspective is honorable a way of life, and by chance probably an incentive, encouraging everyone to work that much harder to promote overall offbeat and possible social mobility.Possibly, there is an ultimate balance by the existence of poverty by depicting a clear division of actor and wealth. There will constantly be the rich, and there will always be the poor and thus balance. Poverty, serves to remind those who arent in that position to have a reason to attain or to achieve just to avoid having to conform to the problem of poverty. Also, the existence of poverty allows others to compare themselves to, just to make the contrast between the two provide certain gratefulness to their situation. As to say that, whatever they are going through couldnt get that much worse than someone who is already in poverty.Conflict Perspective & Its View Concerning Poverty The idea that society is just a continuous power struggle between social classes over the availability and allocation of scarce resources would be the perspective of the Conflict Theorists. The premise of their line of credit is that there doesnt need to be a reason to place blame on people who muster themselves in an impoverished sociostinting condition. Logically, if we continue to place blame on the people who are invigoration in poverty, we continue to s hift the focus off of the problem and onto the individual which shouldnt be the case.There should be a firm emphasis on the bigger societal problems that occur by the hands of the unstable capitalists and grasping elitists who continue to perpetuate a falsified ideology for people to believe in. Conflict Theorists claim that poverty is rooted in past and present prejudice and discrimination that keeps people of color out of the economic mainstream (Kendall 2012). The subpar socioeconomically related living conditions that impoverished African Americans and other minorities find themselves in are just the fuel to the fire. Inadequate housing, sub-standard schools, and crime-ridden neighborhoods (Kendall 2012) causes the high poverty rate among the said(prenominal) racial groups. The lacks of regulated social policies that concern the ever-present and ongoing problems of economic inequality continue to perpetuate the capitalistic ideology as fountainhead as subordinate the ethnic groups that face this alienation. The conflict theorists agree that the geomorphologic problems (substandard schools, inadequate housing etc. are beyond the poor souls control.So in order to rectify this situation, it would behoove the nations political and business leadership to formulate a way to devote people who are living in poverty in unity to being able to afford the basic necessities of life. In addition, the wealthy must(prenominal) face a tax cut, so that the middle class can strengthen and the lower class can shrink. In other words, in order to significantly reduce the problem of poverty conflict theorists believe that we must stop blaming the victim for being poor, but instead find a way that benefits and help the poor people become more(prenominal) affluent, not financially only but economically as well.